We keep avoding the key problem - most of the knowledge that matters in our cognitive machine is not statistical, nor approximate nor obatined by intuition or learning from observations/experience. Where is the intuition or statistical prediction in the fact that the circumference of a circle is 2*PI*r or in the fact that IF x is LARGER-THAN y and y is LARGER-THAN z then x is LARGER-THAN z, or in the fact that a physical object cannot exist in more than one location, or ...

Most IMPORTANT knowledge is not obtained by statistical correlation but is DEDUCED

I am baffeled that knowledgebale scientists insist on the falsity statistics = intelligence